Injunctions get a mention in the news today. A former “Escort” says they are a complete waste of money!
They seem to work well for some politicians, though I suppose they only work well as long those particular politicians do what “the powers that be” require them to do.
1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
Many people seem to be surprised at the upsurge of support for the “People Before Profit” movement.
There really should be no surprise as PBP is not a new movement, it has been around for a long time, almost 2,000 years as a matter of fact.
The founder member of PBP made a very famous statement which has proved resoundingly true throughout the ages. “Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?”
His name was Judas Iscariot and you can read about him in John 12.
12:1 Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was, which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.
2 There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him.
3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.
4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, which should betray him,
5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?
6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
7 Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this.
8 For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.
9 Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus’ sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom he had raised from the dead.
10 But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death;
11 Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.
12 On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem,
13 Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.
14 And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written,
15 Fear not, daughter of Sion: behold, thy King cometh, sitting on an ass’s colt.
16 These things understood not his disciples at the first: but when Jesus was glorified, then remembered they that these things were written of him, and that they had done these things unto him.
17 The people therefore that was with him when he called Lazarus out of his grave, and raised him from the dead, bare record.
18 For this cause the people also met him, for that they heard that he had done this miracle.
19 The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing? behold, the world is gone after him.
20 And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at the feast:
21 The same came therefore to Philip, which was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and desired him, saying, Sir, we would see Jesus.
22 Philip cometh and telleth Andrew: and again Andrew and Philip tell Jesus.
23 And Jesus answered them, saying, The hour is come, that the Son of man should be glorified.
24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.
25 He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.
26 If any man serve me, let him follow me; and where I am, there shall also my servant be: if any man serve me, him will my Father honour.
27 Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.
28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.
29 The people therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered: others said, An angel spake to him.
30 Jesus answered and said, This voice came not because of me, but for your sakes.
31 Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.
32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
33 This he said, signifying what death he should die.
34 The people answered him, We have heard out of the law that Christ abideth for ever: and how sayest thou, The Son of man must be lifted up? who is this Son of man?
35 Then Jesus said unto them, Yet a little while is the light with you. Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you: for he that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth.
36 While ye have light, believe in the light, that ye may be the children of light. These things spake Jesus, and departed, and did hide himself from them.
37 But though he had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on him:
38 That the saying of Esaias the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spake, Lord, who hath believed our report? and to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed?
39 Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again,
40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
41 These things said Esaias, when he saw his glory, and spake of him.
42 Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue:
43 For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.
44 Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me.
45 And he that seeth me seeth him that sent me.
46 I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness.
47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.
49 For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.
50 And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.
A mysterious manifesto has appeared relating to the “Panama Papers” revelations. Part of the manifesto is below.
“For the record, I do not work for any government or intelligence agency, directly or as a contractor, and I never have,” and adds that the reason for sharing the documents was “not… any specific political purpose, but simply because I understood enough about their contents to realise the scale of the injustices they described.”
The author “would be willing to cooperate with law enforcement to the extent that I am able”.
Should be interesting to see the follow-up to this. It looks like some very important people`s very secret sins will be found out.
Antediluvian politics is alive and well in the New Ulster.
Genesis 6:5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
I need to make one more reference to the book, “Killing For Britain.”
Since the “military contact” for John Black was Mike Norman ALLEGEDLY.
What information did Mike Norman convey to John Black before Mike Norman`s death in 2005?
Perhaps the publisher will make it known some day?
Here is a link to the publisher`s website where he identifies Mike Norman as the “military contact.”
The Excerpt from the publisher`s note is below.
**********************************************
Extract from 2016 edition of Killing For Britain, by John Black
IN SEARCH OF “MIKE”
British army sources had, upon reading the manuscript, suggested a likely profile of “Mike”: a senior NCO, late 20s, early 30s, certainly with specialist weapons training, and probable Special Forces involvement.
The author had described “Mike” as being around 6ft with “a decent head of hair”, capable of affecting an “Ulster” accent, one from “out in the country somewhere”, rather than from Belfast. “Mike”, according to the author, had claimed to be Irish originally and had moved to England as a child and grown up in the North East of England before joining the army there. British army sources further suggested that “Mike” was unlikely to have been officially connected to the MRF but was in fact more likely to have been involved in some concurrent operation, one that felt it convenient to use the tag, or catch all “brand name”, of the MRF. Sources further suggested that “Mike” may have been what they called a “secret squirrel”. (Admittedly, other sources though, who were in the MRF in Belfast at that time, deny ever knowing a character such as “Mike”. However, they didn’t have an overview of all Military Intelligence options in play at the time). The shots allegedly fired by “Mike” in the book are clearly those of an uncommonly skilled marksman.
The book was published before we had found “Mike” but with having a firm belief he existed. We believed most of the other claims (apart from the Bloody Sunday ones) could be stood up. Concerns regarding the sheer scale of the amount of so-called OOBs (Out Of Bounds orders) were put to British army sources who responded that if “Mike” existed, there was nothing to stop him claiming to the author that OOBs were in place when none actually were. It was suggested that “Mike’s” job may have been to convince people like the author that their activities were approved of, and supported by, official security forces. In other words, “normal”. This is not unusual where a colonial power has co-opted and encouraged the murderous impulses of “reliable natives”, many of whom develop feelings of doubt, then guilt and then become “unreliable”. Reinforcing their belief that they were in some way, however abstract, part of the army’s efforts stemmed guilt and doubt. It also reinforced their belief that they deserved to be the dominant community. The author’s claims of an OOB being in place are based simply on “Mike” telling him they were. Sources suggested the term OOB might have been a corruption of various terms. It was also suggested that “Mike” could have called them anything he wanted. As far as the author was concerned “Mike” was the army. It must also be said that some sources indulged in something like a campaign of misinformation when responding to our queries.
Post publication we believe we found “Mike”.
Warrant Officer Michael Norman was a sniper of exceptionally high skill to the point that he ended up a sniper instructor at Warminster. He had served in Ireland during the period covered in the book. He was 62 years old in 2005, making him late 20s early 30s in the early 1970s. From North East England, he’d spent time in Ireland as a child where his family had land in Roscommon (according to his ex-wife). He’d joined the Coldstream Guards, as other Geordies had done. Michael Norman was an anonymous witness called by the Bloody Sunday Enquiry, surely only because he was there on that fateful day.
Michael Norman had in his possession photographs relating to the Springhill Massacre when he was found shot dead in his car not far from a police station in Hounslow in April 2005, around 6-8 months after he’d met the author in Ayr, Scotland, in an effort to dissuade him from writing his book. Detectives initially suspected foul play (a so-called IRA “revenge squad” being suspected). Scotland Yard took over the investigation, reportedly “due to the sensitive nature” of Mike Norman’s “work in Ireland”. His death was eventually ruled suicide.
Initial reports stated that a 9mm pistol was found in the car when the body was discovered. However, a police source told us in 2010 that the weapon was actually a shotgun which had been registered to Mike Norman and that he’d shot himself in the stomach. The same source stated that there had been NO photos of the Springhill Massacre in the car at the time, contrary to initial reports on the public record. The source added that Norman had become a quite unstable in later life. It seemed this source might be trying to discredit Norman.
Questions
1. Why would a renowned weapons expert decide to maximise his suffering by shooting himself in the stomach, and with a shotgun at that?
2. Was Mike driving to a police station? If so, why do that with a shotgun, or, for that matter, a 9mm?
3. Why was the weapon changed from a 9mm to a shotgun in different reports? It’s not like they are similar.
4. Why was the presence of photographs from the Springhill Massacre initially claimed at all if they had not been there. As one police source said, “it’s a strange thing to report in the first place if it wasn’t true.”
5. Why was Michael Norman called to give evidence to the Bloody Sunday Enquiry?”
ENDS
*************************************************************
Just saw an excellent example illustrating the very poor standard of “journalism” which is one of the curses of N.Ireland.
Sam McBride is hypocritically trying to brainwash people into voting for a system by which they cannot hope to change the government!
He makes matters worse by telling the public there are politicians who are scoundrels etc, but he does not have the backbone to publicly name the scoundrels????
It is not only politicians who are causing apathy toward political matters, it is also the poor standard of journalism which fails to hold politicians to account which is to blame!
The Bible has the perfect description of useless journalists, they are dumb dogs which cannot bark.
Apparently this is the soldier known as “Mike” who featured in the “Killing For Britain” book.
The claim is made by the publisher in the updated 2016 Kindle version.
Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
I have been informed the author of the book, “Killing For Britain” has recently died.
The author can be seen in the picture found at this link. He is the individual standing behind the RHC banner.
Some of the background about the book I have already put in the public domain.
At this point in time I would like to re-iterate a key point about the publication.
The book was actually produced by two people, the guy who has just died did the writing and he had not been involved in collusion. The second person involved in the production was alleged to have had first hand involvement in real collusion and allegedly had proof of such involvement.
Apparently the two people behind the book and the publisher, came up with the idea of creating a composite character based on the experiences of the two instigators of the intended publication.
Supposedly, the main reason for this composite creation was to make it more difficult for people to pin-point the identity of the person who allegedly had been involved in collusion.
I strongly suspect that the second person involved in producing the publication has also died within the last 18 months, so “Killing For Britain” is now “a closed book.”
No one will be surprised to hear that the authorities were fully aware of the identities of the two people behind this writing project, and no one will be surprised to hear that the authorities never once bothered questioning them about the matter. I wonder why that was?
There are two fascinating Bible verses directly linked to the Lord Jesus Christ and a “closed book.”
One verse is in Luke 4:16-21
16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read.
17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,
18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the broken hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him.
21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.
The precise place where he closed the book is from the book of Isaiah 61:1-3- and it links together the first and second coming of the Lord.
1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;
3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of righteousness, the planting of the Lord, that he might be glorified.
Note, he stopped just before he came to the words, “and the day of vengeance of our God.” He fulfilled the first part of the passage he read when he came the first time, he will fulfil the second part when he returns. On that day, it will literally be, “The day of vengeance of our God”.
The antediluvians of the Labour party are immersed in a very amusing debacle.
People can read the book and decide for themselves what to make of it.
Here is some further reading which someone may find helpful.
THE GHASTLY AWFUL LABOR ZIONIST HOLOCAUST by Barry Chamish
There is no other way to read our nightmare, yet somehow a differing blatant lie has become recent Jewish history. I have simplified the murder of some 800,000 Hungarian Jews, Wikipedia style. ie. Not too obscure or academic. Anyone can follow the bloody trail. And anyone can somehow find a way to deny it.
We start in 1933 when the negotiator of The Transfer Agreement, Chaim Arlozorov is murdered by his pals in the far left Labor Zionist movement, but the right-wing Irgun are set up to take the blame. They are removed from the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem along with the religious Aguda, and Labor hijacks the whole enterprise. First they sign the utterly immoral “Transfer Agreement” which sends 70,000 “pioneers” to Israel from Nazi Germany. Then, in 1937, the Nazis send Adolph Eichmann to Jewish Palestine to report on this co-enterprise.
Meanwhile, the US smells a Holocaust in the immediate future so organizes a conference in Evian, France, with 32 compliant nations to prevent it. Modern Jewish “historians” have interpreted this, I say, sincere, attempt to save Europe’s Jews as a trick to wipe out any future charges of American culpability in the mass murder of an innocent people.
But, no matter, the Labor Zionists hitched their horses to the, you would think, enemy Nazis and fought Evian or knowingly, fought stopping the disgrace of the Holocaust. They got their “pioneers” from them, so sided with Hitler’s ideology over FDR’s.
Nearing the end of WW11, Labor Zionism’s delegate to Hungary-Romania’s chief mass murderer, Adolph Eichmann, Rudolph Kastner, was running around the Nazi empire in an SS uniform saving a few handpicked Jews and delighting in supervising the slaughter of hundreds of thousands more that he could have saved.
Kastner was put on trial in Israel in 1952, lost, and was murdered by the same gangsters who snuffed out Arlozorov. These criminals, who a few years before captured the Irgun for the British, became national hero myths with names like Rabin and Kollek. And their disgraceful neo-history has stuck.
In an article in the English edition of “Mishpacha” in January 2005 appeared the following:
A few months after The Transfer Agreement was signed, at the eighteenth Zionist Congress held in Prague in August 1933, Ben-Gurion said, “Eretz Yisrael today needs not ordinary immigrants, but pioneers. The difference between them is simple — an immigrant comes to take from the land, whereas a pioneer comes to give to the land. Therefore we demand priority for Aliyah to pioneers.”
The question which remains is who would decide who was “the best type of Jew”? At the 20th Zionist Congress held in Zurich in August 1937, Chaim Weizmann spelled out more specifically what was meant by “selective Aliyah.”
“I told the members of the Royal [Peel] Commission that six million Jews want to go on Aliyah. One of the members asked me ‘ Do you think you could bring all of them to Eretz Yisrael?’ On this I answered … that two million young people… we want to save. The old people will pass. They will bear their fate or they will not. They have already become like dust, economic and moral dust in this cruel world…”
Pinchas Gross who had been one of the public workers of Agudat Yisrael in Rumania stated, “The first principle of the Zionist Aliyah Committee in Bucharest was not to allow members of Agudat Yisrael (religious Zionism) to go on Aliyah to Eretz Yisrael. . Shlichim from the [Aliyah] Committee in Bucharest arrived in Transylvania with large sums of money in order to transfer hundreds of pioneers to Bucharest for the purpose of Aliyah. We also asked for our members the possibility of Aliyah but we were rudely rejected.”
Dr. Judah Leon Magnes in addressing a meeting of the Rescue Committee in July 1944 was very critical of those who wanted,”first of all to save the Zionists, and afterwards, if possible — also the others, but above all the Zionists. I spoke to somebody…. The man said… we will save our men…. I said to him … the others are also Jews. He said: It is so, they are Jews, but this is a universal argument, a perpetual argument and we will not give in on this.”
Rabbi Baruch Yehoshua Yerachmiel Rabinowicz, the Munkaczer Rebbe in Hungary, was involved in this rescue effort and the question of a meeting with him was mentioned at this Jewish Agency meeting. In answer Ben-Gurion stated that he did not oppose such a meeting, “We must do everything in this matter [of rescue] including things which seem fantastic.” Had Ben-Gurion said no more, it would have been praiseworthy, but he then continued, “But there is one condition: the work will not cause damage to Zionism.”
Perhaps the subject would have been hysterically urgent if a deal hadn’t been cut with the Nazi who could have saved everyone, Adolph Eichmann. But he just returned from a Labor Zionist kibbutz where he had a whale of an ideological, and I dare guess more, time.
Hiding in Argentina, Eichmann discussed Palestine and Kasztner on tape. After his capture in 1960, Life magazine published excerpts. On the kibbutz in 1937, he;
“did see enough to be very impressed by the way the Jewish colonists were building up their land. I admired their desperate will to live, the more so since I was myself an idealist. In the years that followed I often said to Jews with whom I had dealings that, had I been a Jew, I would have been a fanatical Zionist. I could not imagine being anything else. In fact, I would have been the most ardent Zionist imaginable.” (“Eichmann Tells His Own Damning Story,” Life [28 November 1960], p. 22).
In the same self-serving memorial justification he recalls offering Kastner (Kasztner) the release of ALL entrapped Hungarian Jews for 700 trucks but was rejected: He described Kasztner as; “a fanatical Zionist. He agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation — and even keep order in the collection camps — if I would close my eyes and let a few hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine. It was a good bargain. For keeping order in the camps, the price of 15,000 or 20,000 Jews — in the end there may have been more — was not too high for me. And because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the deportation camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape.”
In 1952, a Hungarian-born Israeli journalist, Malchiel Greenwald, accused a high-ranking Labor Party official, Rudolph Kastner, of working hand in hand with Eichmann to murder 800,000 Hungarian Jews, while saving several hundred of his own family and associates. It was Ben Hecht, in 1962, who exposed the Greenwald trial in his classic book, Perfidy:
http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol03.htmlDr.
Rudolf Verba, a Doctor of Science now serving at the British Medical Research Council, was one of the few escapees from Auschwitz. In his memoirs published in February, 1961, in the London Daily Herald, he wrote: I am a Jew. In spite of that – indeed because of that – I accuse certain Jewish leaders of one of the most ghastly deeds of the war. This small group of quislings knew what was happening to their brethren in Hitler’s gas chambers and bought their own lives with the price of silence.
Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all Jews in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz – the number is still on my arm – I compiled careful statistics of the exterminations…I took these terrible statistics with me when I escaped in 1944 and I was able to give Hungarian Zionist leaders three weeks notice that Eichmann planned to send a million of their Jews to his gas chambers…Kastner went to Eichmann and told him, ‘I know of your plans; spare some Jews of my choice and I shall keep quiet.’ Eichmann not only agreed, but dressed Kastner up in S.S. uniform and took him to Belsen to trace some of his friends. Nor did the sordid bargaining end there.
**Kastner paid Eichmann several thousand dollars. With this little fortune, Eichmann was able to buy his way to freedom when Germany collapsed, to set himself up in the Argentine…(Ben Hecht, Perfidy, pp261-2)end ***
My contribution, a good starter anyway, is Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism And The Holocaust. Just go to www.lulu.com and type in my name in the search box.
Edwin Black also wrote a book revealing the rarely discussed deal the Nazis made with the Jewish Agency giving Jews the ability to emigrate to Palestine between 1933-38. The agreement called Haavara Agreement (Hebrew : Translit.: heskem haavara Translated: “transfer agreement”) was the precursor to the final solution when Hitler’s motive was only to rid Germany of Jews, not slaughter them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הסכם העברה Translit.: heskem haavara Translated: “transfer agreement”) was signed on 25 August 1933 after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. The agreement was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine. While it helped Jews emigrate, it forced them to temporarily give up possessions to Germany before departing. Those possessions could later be re-obtained by transferring them to Palestine as German export goods.[1][2]
Hanotea
Hanotea (Hebrew: הנוטע), a Zionist citrus planting company, applied in May 1933 for the ability to transfer capital from Germany to Palestine. Hanotea served to assist German Jews’ immigration to Palestine as part of the Zionist endeavor. In a deal worked out with the German government, Hanotea would receive money from prospective immigrants and use this money to buy German goods. These goods, along with the immigrants, would then be shipped to Palestine. In Palestine, import merchants would then buy the goods from the immigrants, liquidating their investment. This arrangement appeared to be operating successfully, and so paved the way for the later Haavara Agreement. Connected to Hanotea was a Polish Zionist Jew, Sam Cohen. He represented Zionist interests in direct negotiation with the Nazis beginning in March 1933.[3]
“ CERTIFICATE
The Trust and Transfer Office “Haavara” Ltd. places at the disposal of the Banks in Palestine amounts in Reichmarks which have been put at its disposal by the Jewish immigrants from Germany. The Banks avail themselves of these amounts in Reichmarks in order to make payments on behalf of Palestinian merchants for goods imported by them from Germany. The merchants pay in the value of the goods to the Banks and the “Haavara” Ltd. pays the countervalue to the Jewish immigrants from Germany. To the same extent that local merchants will make use of this arrangement, the import of German goods will serve to withdraw Jewish capital from Germany.
The Trust and Transfer Office,
HAAVARA, LTD.
”
—Example of the certificate issued by Haavara to Jews emigrating to Palestine [4]
The Haavara (Transfer) Agreement was agreed to by the German government in 1933 to allow the Zionist movement, in the form of the Haavara company to transfer property from Germany to Palestine, for the sole purpose of encouraging Jewish emigration from Germany. The Haavara company operated under a similar plan as the earlier Hanotea company. The Haavara Company required immigrants to pay at least 1000 pounds sterling into the banking company. This money would then be used to buy German exports for import to Palestine.
The Haavara Agreement was thought among certain circles to be a possible way to rid the country of its supposed “Jewish problem.” The head of the Middle Eastern division of the foreign ministry, Werner Otto von Hentig, supported the policy of concentrating Jews in Palestine. Von Hentig believed that if the Jewish population was concentrated in a single foreign entity, then foreign diplomatic policy and containment of the Jews would become easier.[5] Hitler’s support of the Haavara Agreement varied throughout the thirties. Initially, Hitler criticized the agreement, but shortly reversed his opinion, and continued to support it, in the face of opposition, through 1939.[6]
Évian Conference
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Évian Conference was convened at the initiative of US President Franklin D. Roosevelt in July 1938 to respond to the plight of the increasing numbers of Jewish refugees fleeing persecution in Europe by the Nazis—and perhaps he hoped to obtain commitments from some of the invitee nations to accept more refugees, although he took pains to avoid stating that objective plainly. It was true that Roosevelt desired to deflect attention and criticism from his own national policy that severely limited the quota of Jewish refugees admitted to the United States.[1]
For eight days, from July 6 to 15 at Évian-les-Bains, France, representatives from 32 countries and 39 private organizations and some 24 voluntary organizations met and formally discussed the issue among themselves, both orally and in writing.[2] Golda Meir, the attendee from Palestine, was the only representative of a landed Jewish constituency, but she was not permitted to speak or to participate in the proceedings except as an observer. Some 200 international journalists gathered at Évian to observe and report the conclave.
The dispossessed and displaced Jews of Austria and Germany were hopeful that this international conference would lead to acceptance of more refugees and safe haven. “The United States had always been viewed in Europe as champion of freedom and under her powerful influence and following her example, certainly many countries would provide the chance to get out of the German trap. The rescue, a new life seemed in reach.”[3]
Hitler responded to the news of the conference by saying essentially that if the other nations would agree to take the Jews, he would help them leave.
One of many of Edwin Black’s erudite compositions….The Transfer Agreement http://www.amazon.com/The-Transfer-Agreement-2…/…/0914153137
Read one of my best books: Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism And The Holocaust http://www.lulu.com/content/336970
********************************************************************
Whether people like it or not, or believe it or not, this is all linked to Biblical end times prophecy.
The ongoing story of the Hillsborough deaths has dominated the news for most of the week, and rightly so.
One of the major reasons why the victims and survivors have been able to get this far, is the fact they willingly accept that the modern UK state establishment is corrupt to the core!
A major drawback in the quest for justice for Unionist victims and survivors is their reluctance to hold the state responsible for their crimes. They tend to focus merely on the so-called “IRA” terrorists, when in fact the terrorists and state were working together.
psalm79.com 
You must be logged in to post a comment.